The questionnaire contained 3 bits. Region I provided issues out-of socio-demographic research (ages, level of studies, parity, familial earnings, job, current relationship standing, sexual interest, reputation of HPV inoculation, and you can reputation for unusual cervical cancers evaluating).

Region II comprised of six questions regarding the target women who shall be processed, decades to begin with, regularity, years otherwise requirements to eliminate off testing, and techniques from tests. Just the participants who had ever heard off HPV would proceed so you can Part III and therefore analyzed knowledge about HPV out-of their sort of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), form regarding transmission and prevention.

Ahead of the study, the fresh new survey regarding region II and area III within the Thai adaptation was basically considered, chatted about, and you may revised up to opinion certainly one of 20 boffins have been the gynecologic oncologists (some were writers in Albanisk kvinder til Г¦gteskab other synchronous studies). The professionals ranked all of 19 questions due to the fact both ‘relevant’ or ‘maybe not relevant’. The item-level Stuff Legitimacy Index (I-CVI) is determined for each and every goods, therefore the Posts Legitimacy Directory (CVI) try determined by firmly taking the common proportion off fourteen questions relating to understanding of cervical cancers tests and you will 5 questions regarding HPV. This new CVI were 1 for both parts of the newest survey (S1 Dining table). The fresh new reliability was checked out into the 30 women with similar feature since users. The fresh Cronbach’ alpha coefficients into accuracy have been 0.819 to own information about cervical cancer evaluating and 0.907 for understanding of HPV.

Study range

Into go out away from booked colposcopy, the research assistant considering guidance of your research towards women just who met inclusion conditions. The women exactly who accessible to participate provided created told agree and you will responded the newest questionnaire independently on their own prior to proceeding to help you colposcopy.

Research collected because of it study was indeed socio-group research (Region I of survey), expertise in cervical malignant tumors testing (Area II), and you may knowledge of HPV (Part III).

Statistical analysis

New answers of knowledge regarding the cervical cancers examination and HPV were assessed by the for every items prior to scoring categorization. Correct address try obtained since step 1 while ‘incorrect and being unsure of answer’ try scored 0.

Regarding fourteen concerns of cervical cancers tests, women whoever get was indeed ? 10 have been randomly categorized as the having ‘a great knowledge’ if not have been regarded as with “not good degree”. Getting experience in HPV, female whoever answer was ‘never heard of HPV’ was in fact omitted on the study away from HPV degree.

From 5 inquiries, women whose score was basically ? step three had been considered as with ‘an effective knowledge of HPV’ if not since the ‘not good knowledge’. Out-of 19 inquiries, feminine whoever get have been ? 13 were classified due to the fact that have ‘good complete knowledge’ if not since ‘not good total knowledge’.

Most of the research had been collected into the an electronic databases and you will analyzed using SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive analytics were utilized to analyze demographic data and was described because quantity having percentage, suggest with basic departure otherwise median which have range. The latest association ranging from for every adjustable and you can knowledge score was assessed using easy linear regression. Exploratory design was made inside the multivariable research and additionally all parameters possibly connected with the knowledge score. The felt level of mathematical advantages try an excellent p-worth of 0.05 otherwise quicker.

Show

Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>